Guess the Game by its Metacritic Excerpt

Us game bloggers talk a lot about games and play a lot of games but rarely make games ourselves. Well here’s one I just thought of. Below are several portions of reviews excerpted by Metacritic. The goal is to correctly identify the game it’s about.

These are all critically and commercially successful games everyone’s familiar with, so if you know enough about games to be reading this blog then none of these should be unknown to you. Also, don’t restrict yourself to using a game only once. Have fun guessing!

Tutorial: Highlight the gray areas to get the name of the game linking to its Metacritic page.

Please do our advertising for us:
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
12 years ago

I’m not sure if Jackson was trying to get at this, but this post reminded me of a thought I’ve been having lately – it seems as if gamers are hesitant to approach their hobby with a reasonably critical eye.

Here’s an example. As a child, you might have loved the GI Joe and Transformers cartoons. As an adult, you may still like them, but not because you find them as gripping or action packed, but because they’re goofy and funny and bring back a ton of memories. You still like them (not ironically either), but you can easily admit that they aren’t the pinnacle of animation in any way.

As adults, we go through this cycle constantly, taking stock of the things we loved as children and teenagers, and determining which still hold a place in your heart, and which aren’t really worth your time. There’s nothing wrong with it, and in fact it’s rather healthy.

I don’t feel as if gamers are fond of doing this. We still look back at games of yore with the same amounts of awe and praise that we did years ago. I mean, there’s nothing wrong with having loved Metal Gear Solid or Final Fantasy 7 back in 1997/98. But we don’t have to keep convincing ourselves that they’re still great examples of videogame storytelling. They were crucial points in the evolution of the medium, but we can do better now, should do better now. I don’t think that looking at these games from this perspective puts them in a bad light. Not everything is going to be timeless, and not everything timeless is going to be hugely influential. Both are important for the history of gaming.

That’s why these reviews bother me. Most of these games are going to look hokey in fifteen years (if they don’t already). Are people going to admit this (while still acknowledging their impact at the time?), or are they going to be writing fresh essays about what we can learn from them?

12 years ago

That’s what I figured.

Any thoughts on my post?

12 years ago

That’s some great food for thought. And thanks for linking to your blog – I lost the URL earlier.

I think you’re correct that the time invested could be a major factor. After all, if you spend that much time with something, you don’t want to feel as if it was a waste (though if you learned something from it all, and had fun, it can’t be entirely a waste).

As for making connections with the characters within games, I’m not sure what to think. It sounds right, to be sure, and I can remember quite a few games that I connected with as a youth. But unlike my real life relationships, that emotional connection no longer exists in my mind.

Perhaps a lot of it comes down to the person, rather than the game. I can say for certain that one reason many games stopped resonating with me is because somewhere along the line, each one did something that shattered the illusion. In Grandia 2 it was the gauntlet of boss battles in the finale. In FF7, Aeris’ death rang hollow when I realized I had lost my best mage. While I don’t ignore game stories, I think I’m conditioned to be more concerned with the mechanics and the design. So if either one of those things become faulty, I notice, and whatever spell the story casts on me is shattered. Once that happens, I can observe them from a more objective position, in which case I realize that these stories weren’t quite as good as I thought they were. Of course, if the illusion is never shattered, then the emotional connection is probably a lot stronger.